Dile NO al formato de Microsoft Office como estándar ISO
OpenXML (OOXML) no debe ser ISO 29500

Solicito a los miembros del comité nacional de ISO que voten "NO" a ISO DIS 29500 (formato documental Office OpenXML, OOXML) y aporto las siguientes razones principales:

  1. Ya hay un estándar, ISO 26300, llamado Open Document Format (ODF): un doble estándar supondrá incertidumbre, confusión y un coste añadido para la industria, gobiernos y ciudadanos.;
  2. No hay ninguna implementación de referencia de la especificación de OOXML: Microsoft Office 2007 produce una versión especial de OOXML que no cumple con la especificación de OOXML propuesta en ISO;
  3. En el documento de especificación falta información como, por ejemplo, cómo implementar un “autoSpaceLikeWord95” o un “useWord97LineBreakRules”;
  4. Más del 10% de los ejemplos de su especificación no validan la conformidad con XML;
  5. No existe garantía alguna para que cualquiera pueda implementar parcial o totalmente la especificación de OOXML sin arriesgarse a que Microsoft le exija daños y perjuicios por infracción de patentes o el pago de licencias de patentes;
  6. Esta propuesta de estándar entra en conflicto con otros estándares ISO, como ISO 8601 (representación de fechas y tiempos), ISO 639 (códigos de representación de nombre e idiomas) o ISO/IEC 10118-3 (funciones hash de criptografía);
  7. 1.Hay un error en la especificación del fichero de formatos de hoja de cálculo que impide introducir cualquier fecha previa al año 1900. Esto es un error que se arrastra desde las obsoletas versiones de 16bits de la aplicación MS-Office;
  8. Esta propuesta de estándar no ha sido creada aunando la experiencia y mejores prácticas de todas las partes interesadas (tales como productores, distribuidores, consumidores, usuarios y reguladores), sino por Microsoft en solitario.
First name:
Last name:
City:
Country:
Email:
You will receive a verification email to this address.
Comments:

Últimos firmantes

Total number of signatures: 94989

Most recent signatures:

  • James Bowman, United States, 14 May 2022 15:58
    Comments: s
  • John Sutcliffe, New Zealand, 09 Sep 2019 09:02
  • Ryan Cunningham, United States, 11 May 2019 21:25
  • Cyril Streit, Switzerland, 28 Dec 2018 10:17
    Comments: Py iiiiii
  • Marian Šámal, Czech Republic, 08 Mar 2018 20:20
    Comments: Why is it called OPEN xml?
  • Dominik Leipold, Germany, 04 Mar 2018 08:49
    Comments: I once had to spend days of publicly funded working time trying to implement some bits of the OOXML specification – things that take mere minutes when using other open formats.
  • anders LJ, Denmark, 16 Jan 2018 13:01
    Comments: test
  • Den Shitoff, Russian Federation, 21 Jul 2017 10:09
    Comments: no comments
  • Walid Boudelal, Algeria, 21 Jun 2017 07:37
  • Danial Behzadi, Iran, 27 Jul 2015 18:46
  • Luis Roberto Gutiérrez, Mexico, 28 Jan 2015 06:00
  • Yajie Hu, China, 20 Nov 2014 04:31
    Comments: I especially agree with reasons 1 and 6. Other problems can be fixed, but existing ISO standards should be conformed.
  • Enrique Santos Leal, Spain, 18 Jul 2014 13:09
    Comments: ¡Bravo!
  • Janos Agoston, Hungary, 12 Jul 2014 12:20
    Comments: -
  • Carlos Almeida, Portugal, 15 Apr 2014 22:03
  • Ryan Walmsley, United Kingdom, 11 Mar 2014 14:44
  • Łukasz Konieczny, Poland, 19 Apr 2013 18:45
  • Walter F. Viera Dos Santos, Argentina, 22 Jan 2013 08:00
  • Tim Sanders, United States, 11 Jan 2013 19:16
    Comments: Microsoft just needs to stop this stuff, they have MORE than enough money to cure all the sick people around the world, now it's just greed
  • Jan Kawalski, United Kingdom, 09 Jan 2013 01:22
  • Jānis Strankals, Latvia, 26 Dec 2012 13:16
    Comments: Noone needs tens of proprietary file formats.
  • Andrew Websdale, United Kingdom, 05 Dec 2012 15:56
  • Sébastien André, France, 27 Nov 2012 22:00
  • Ahmad Zafrullah, Indonesia, 25 Nov 2012 02:00
    Comments: i agree
  • Daniil Pavlenko, Russian Federation, 23 Nov 2012 08:29
  • HUGUETTE DROUIN, France, 12 Nov 2012 15:08
  • yogi kumar, India, 30 Oct 2012 06:48
    Comments: Greater transparency is the need for the day.
  • Paulo Leonardo Souza Brizolara, Brazil, 30 Oct 2012 00:36
  • Malith Yapa, Malaysia, 29 Oct 2012 07:43
    Comments: ooxml is unnecessary and promotes antitrust behaviour
  • David Delma, Burkina Faso, 28 Oct 2012 23:55
  • Shankara Narayana R, India, 28 Oct 2012 13:28
  • Magnus Björk, Sweden, 26 Oct 2012 11:56
  • Evgenij Isakov, Russian Federation, 17 Oct 2012 11:38
    Comments: Microsoft - crap and theirs standarts are crap too.
  • Yu Jia Chang, Taiwan, 15 Oct 2012 13:03
  • Christian Ditscher, Germany, 11 Oct 2012 21:04
  • Paul Barbu, Romania, 03 Oct 2012 19:07
    Comments: FOSS should be the way to go!
  • Corifeanu Jane, Romania, 03 Oct 2012 16:47
    Comments: I am using very old files I don"t whant problems
  • Andrei Petcu, Romania, 03 Oct 2012 11:36
    Comments: google "fii liber nu va putem citi documentele"
  • Codru Vrabie, Romania, 03 Oct 2012 09:27
  • Walter Schneider, Romania, 03 Oct 2012 09:09
  • Banu Marcel, Romania, 03 Oct 2012 04:53
  • Stoian Ovidiu, Romania, 03 Oct 2012 04:07
    Comments: NU formatului Microsoft Office ca standard ISO.
  • Cristian Moldovan, Romania, 02 Oct 2012 20:58
    Comments: Susțin această inițiativă.
    Support this initiative.
  • BACIRCEA ZOLTAN, Romania, 02 Oct 2012 20:00
  • le vo huu tai, Vietnam, 01 Oct 2012 00:09
  • Hawa Mariko, Belgium, 27 Sep 2012 13:03
  • Marius Gavrilescu, Romania, 18 Sep 2012 14:20
  • KyooChan Cho, Korea, Republic of, 12 Sep 2012 00:30
  • alexandre peltier, France, 11 Sep 2012 12:11
  • Alexandr Kononov, Russian Federation, 23 Aug 2012 11:27
  • ismail hakkı, Turkey, 21 Aug 2012 19:25
    Comments: <HAYIR>
  • 王 远智, China, 10 Aug 2012 10:34
  • Uijin Chen, Taiwan, 07 Aug 2012 06:35
  • Jesse Lapere, Canada, 06 Aug 2012 23:17
  • Emanuele Rusconi, Italy, 29 Jul 2012 10:58
  • Luca Delpivo, Italy, 20 Jul 2012 06:28
    Comments: Standardization is a must!
  • Roque Velazquez, Mexico, 18 Jul 2012 02:49
  • renaud dargent, France, 02 Jul 2012 21:22
  • Lus Aguilar, Mexico, 28 Jun 2012 17:07
  • Lyubomir Krastev, Bulgaria, 20 Jun 2012 12:42
    Comments: Same-purpose software products should be able to use each other's document output without any issues. Interoperability rifts caused by closed formats and non-compliance to specification MUST NOT EXIST in this age of user choice and standardization. Say NO to vendor lock-in.
  • José Mesa, Spain, 15 Jun 2012 17:41
    Comments: NO a OOXML. Libertad para la información. NO a los monopolios.
  • Giovanni Conte, Italy, 14 Jun 2012 09:48
  • Pasquale Maccarone, Italy, 10 Jun 2012 17:12
  • Francois Beckers, Belgium, 07 Jun 2012 21:25
  • Ethan Wheeler, United Kingdom, 03 Jun 2012 12:17
    Comments: The ISO exist to create standards, not advocate vendor lock-in: the standardisation of OOXML would not help with their mission, but would instead hold them back in achieving it.
  • F. Faure, France, 25 May 2012 13:57
  • Nicole Sigaud, Brazil, 21 May 2012 15:07
    Comments: ISO group cannot bow to MS, this is immoral and certainly will stain forever ISO's credibility
  • Christian Zerbst, Spain, 09 May 2012 16:14
  • Simon Heimbach, Germany, 09 May 2012 09:07
  • Denis Haine, Canada, 08 May 2012 13:28
  • David Ayers, Austria, 02 May 2012 10:41
    Comments: If ODF doesn't meet the criteria needed to store someones Office implementation, then that some needs to take part in the ODF definition instead of undermining the integrity of an international Standards-Body by unilaterally defining their own standard.
  • Geza Ujvari, Hungary, 24 Apr 2012 19:28
  • Bora UZ, Turkey, 21 Apr 2012 09:40
    Comments: Kartele son
  • Siddhartha Ghosh, India, 20 Apr 2012 05:05
  • semih arslan, Turkey, 19 Apr 2012 08:29
    Comments: We do not want Microsoft Office
  • Zekeriya Bozkurt, Turkey, 19 Apr 2012 08:05
    Comments: HAYIR
  • Matthias Brinke, Germany, 17 Apr 2012 12:17
    Comments: I fear that OOXML standardisation would
    benefit mostly only Microsoft, and libre/open-source software development would be hindered.
  • rıdvan peker, Turkey, 16 Apr 2012 19:53
  • Can Yalçın Armutcuoğlu, Turkey, 12 Apr 2012 19:37
  • Suleyman Pasoglu, Turkey, 12 Apr 2012 09:07
    Comments: For Freedom F**K YOU microsoft
  • özgür ulusoy, Turkey, 10 Apr 2012 13:08
  • Asal nanaz, Iran, 10 Apr 2012 08:19
    Comments: ***بگذار عشق خاصیت تو باشد نه رابطه ی تو با کسی***
  • Maurizio D Aniello, Italy, 07 Apr 2012 08:22
  • Priyanka Darke, India, 06 Apr 2012 14:29
  • kumar vikas, India, 05 Apr 2012 14:14
  • Gabriele Castagneti, Italy, 04 Apr 2012 13:27
  • fatih oksuz, Turkey, 02 Apr 2012 14:26
  • Fevzi Özgür Nergis, Turkey, 01 Apr 2012 18:35
  • Sinan Biçici, Turkey, 31 Mar 2012 10:51
    Comments: standart adı altında özgürlüklere ve değişik fikirlere kısıtlama getirilemez.
  • Marin Dimitrov, Bulgaria, 27 Mar 2012 18:15
  • Ziya Develioglu, Turkey, 27 Mar 2012 15:19
    Comments: I do not want any enforce on my selection by standards ...
  • alp tekin, Turkey, 27 Mar 2012 13:56
    Comments: haaaayıııııır
  • alain spiltoir, Belgium, 24 Mar 2012 21:30
    Comments: les monopoles sont toujours dictatoriaux ...
  • Pedro Vílchez, Spain, 21 Mar 2012 19:20
  • Dmitriy Shikhaleev, Russian Federation, 10 Mar 2012 16:14
  • Zafer Ozsoy, Turkey, 08 Mar 2012 12:38
    Comments: Standardize and support open formats. Proprietary tech is just that, proprietary.
  • erdem eskiünürlü, Turkey, 08 Mar 2012 11:49
    Comments: özgürlükler engellendikçe hayal gücüde engelleniyor programcıları özgür bırakalımki daha güçlü birbirini kopyalamayan fikirler ile gelsinler
  • Serter GÖNEN, Turkey, 07 Mar 2012 23:45
    Comments: TEKEL'in sadece birası güzel,başka bir şekli değil!
  • Tolga ÖZEFE, Turkey, 07 Mar 2012 01:11
    Comments: Microsoft vb. firmaların tekelleşme çabalarına hayır diyorum.
  • Marcelo Puerta, Argentina, 06 Mar 2012 23:10
    Comments: No esposible aceptar la presión de una empresa,solo por el dinero que reparte... Lo propuesto por MS es una mamarracho, que busca seguir robando al usuario raptando su información en un estandar privativo.
  • Cem Çelebi, Turkey, 06 Mar 2012 21:23
  • Mustafa Usluer, Turkey, 05 Mar 2012 09:59
  • Cengiz Tek, Turkey, 04 Mar 2012 16:22
  • Fatih Tosun, Turkey, 26 Feb 2012 16:01
    Comments: Consider o spessific brand of bottled water is the standard. And you will have problems to drink tap water. Standardisation benefits for the people. Not for companies.
  • Murat Aksoy, Turkey, 24 Feb 2012 19:54
  • Baris Ergan, Turkey, 24 Feb 2012 19:09
  • Mihai Tatar, Romania, 22 Feb 2012 23:45
  • Şafak BALCI, Turkey, 22 Feb 2012 12:19
    Comments: Özgür ve ücretsiz olmalı.
  • Haluk Ulku, Turkey, 21 Feb 2012 13:18
    Comments: erişimin serbest olduğu platformaları tercih ediyorum.
  • Taylan YILDIZ, Turkey, 20 Feb 2012 20:10
  • Serdar Bekiroglu, Turkey, 18 Feb 2012 08:35
    Comments: We better use an open and free platform standard.
  • Emre Yetim, Turkey, 14 Feb 2012 11:21
  • Mehmet Sahin, Turkey, 13 Feb 2012 20:35
    Comments: We do not want Microsoft Office
  • Uğur YILMAZ, Turkey, 11 Feb 2012 17:50
  • berhan akbulut, Turkey, 10 Feb 2012 12:45
  • ilker koç, Turkey, 07 Feb 2012 07:58
  • osman kibar, Turkey, 04 Feb 2012 20:22
  • kadir demir, Turkey, 04 Feb 2012 10:46
    Comments: <HAYIR>OOXML
  • İBRAHİM HALİL ERDOĞAN, Turkey, 25 Jan 2012 15:43
  • mehmet park, Turkey, 25 Jan 2012 15:08
  • Vladimir Shapkin, Russian Federation, 25 Jan 2012 07:36
  • Çağrı Sivrikaya, Turkey, 23 Jan 2012 20:00
    Comments: No for standart ISO programming
  • hüseyin karakus, Turkey, 20 Jan 2012 20:39
    Comments: Nooooo
  • Gokhan Koc, Turkey, 20 Jan 2012 14:37
    Comments: Paid software could not be a standart.
  • riza vatansever, Turkey, 18 Jan 2012 20:27
  • hasan kutlu, Turkey, 17 Jan 2012 14:58
    Comments: MICROSOFT OFFICE NO FREE. THEREFORE CANNOT BE ISO STANDARTS.
  • Ensari Eroglu, Turkey, 17 Jan 2012 13:50
  • Murat Dilekmen, Turkey, 14 Jan 2012 13:49
  • süleyman uğurlu, Turkey, 11 Jan 2012 13:16
    Comments: terrible , horrible absolutely ı dont want it
  • Danial Behzadi, Iran, 10 Jan 2012 21:14
  • Kuba Kucharski, Poland, 08 Jan 2012 23:13
  • Livio Recchia, Italy, 06 Jan 2012 18:05
    Comments: The ISO must must reject the OOXML because standardizing Microsoft's proficts against our freedom is a crime against all the people in the world.
  • ronald gruss, France, Metropolitan, 06 Jan 2012 15:43
  • Koray Elbaşı, Turkey, 02 Jan 2012 08:23
  • ABDULLAH KÜÇÜKMADAN, Turkey, 01 Jan 2012 15:36
    Comments: Vote NO against to monopolization.
  • Ali Uçarer, Turkey, 01 Jan 2012 14:23
    Comments: Free softwares is necessary for free world.
  • Xavier Verley, France, 29 Dec 2011 10:17
  • yunus tas, Turkey, 29 Dec 2011 07:03
    Comments: terrible , horrible absolutely ı dont want it
  • Edwin Valencia, Peru, 29 Dec 2011 01:03
  • ismail ekmekci, Turkey, 28 Dec 2011 16:31
    Comments: Hali hazırda Open Document Format (ODF) isimli ISO26300 kodlu bir standart bulunuyor. Aynı konuda iki standart bulunması endüstri, devletler ve vatandaşlar için ek maliyet demektir
  • Ahmet Furkan Karatopraklı, Turkey, 27 Dec 2011 00:15
  • Hakan Çırpak, Turkey, 25 Dec 2011 16:58
  • MEHMET EDIZ ESEN, Turkey, 25 Dec 2011 10:13
  • fikret sanal, Turkey, 22 Dec 2011 15:20
    Comments: i dont like microsoft office
  • Osman GÜLSEVER, Turkey, 18 Dec 2011 11:42
    Comments: HAYIR
  • Emre KARAKUZULU, Turkey, 15 Dec 2011 15:15
    Comments: HAYIR
  • muhammet köprübaşı, Turkey, 14 Dec 2011 09:49
  • Mert Erken, Turkey, 14 Dec 2011 09:05
    Comments: HAYIR
  • Ufuk Karadeniz, Turkey, 13 Dec 2011 22:29
  • Madis Kalme, Estonia, 13 Dec 2011 20:28
    Comments: Single standard (ODF) for the future!
  • SELAMETTİN DURMUŞ, Turkey, 10 Dec 2011 13:31
    Comments: x
  • Gokhan TOPRAK, Turkey, 07 Dec 2011 15:16
  • franco sacchetti, Italy, 05 Dec 2011 08:56
  • Ales Kurecka, Czech Republic, 01 Dec 2011 14:52
    Comments: "Open" must be OPEN!!! Like ODF...
  • alphan kiray, Turkey, 30 Nov 2011 16:45
  • Mümtaz Budak, Turkey, 29 Nov 2011 20:40
  • Gökmen YAPALI, Turkey, 29 Nov 2011 09:49
    Comments: Ulusal ISO üyelerinden OOXML spesifikasyonunun ISO standartı haline getirilmesine HAYIR oyu vermesini istiyorum
  • Mahmut Tuncay, Turkey, 27 Nov 2011 16:24
  • teng huang, Taiwan, 27 Nov 2011 15:54
    Comments: i not like m$
  • SABRİ ARSLAN, Turkey, 27 Nov 2011 13:52
  • VEDAT GÖKÇE, Turkey, 24 Nov 2011 18:15
    Comments: hayır
  • antoine caron, France, 23 Nov 2011 23:08
    Comments: Waste microsoft
  • Imran Yusubov, Azerbaijan, 19 Nov 2011 18:32
    Comments: NOOPENXMICROSOFTL
  • adem deliaslan, Turkey, 16 Nov 2011 13:10
  • Maurizio Ricciardi, Italy, 15 Nov 2011 14:36
    Comments: NO!
  • semih albuz, Turkey, 14 Nov 2011 14:57
    Comments: no !
  • hakan savci, Turkey, 12 Nov 2011 14:17
  • kazim özdogan, Turkey, 11 Nov 2011 23:51
  • Gediz Ünsalan, Turkey, 11 Nov 2011 11:58
    Comments: NO to the monopolies !!!
  • Sercan Çınar, Turkey, 11 Nov 2011 11:19
  • C. Remzi Eriş, Turkey, 10 Nov 2011 13:44
  • L.K. Natonski, Germany, 10 Nov 2011 01:22
    Comments: Non possumus!!!
  • CAROLA LEDEZMA, Venezuela, 10 Nov 2011 01:09
    Comments: Que viva el conocimiento libre!!
  • fernando di mieri, Italy, 09 Nov 2011 21:45
  • Mehmet Doğan, Turkey, 08 Nov 2011 18:20
  • Taner SANCAR, Turkey, 08 Nov 2011 12:47
  • Luca Molari, Italy, 07 Nov 2011 16:22
  • furkan can paral, Turkey, 04 Nov 2011 11:30
    Comments: erenlerfurkan
  • Haluk Zoraltun, Turkey, 02 Nov 2011 14:40
    Comments: Any monopoly or cartell preparation should be avoided. People should have the right of choosing.
  • Ozgur Gul, Turkey, 01 Nov 2011 20:02
    Comments: No sire! This seems pretty closed and locked behind doors! Lets' open that! :D
  • Murat Gebze, Turkey, 01 Nov 2011 14:27
    Comments: ODF is the way to go!
  • huseyin sucu, Turkey, 31 Oct 2011 16:31
  • Fatih Korkmaz, Turkey, 30 Oct 2011 17:13
  • Ramazan Akgün USTA, Turkey, 29 Oct 2011 19:23
    Comments: That's not fair at all... It is a commercial brand. Must not be the standard.
  • Ryan Bertrand, United States, 25 Oct 2011 22:16
    Comments: I strongly disapprove of the Microsoft
    standard. Microsoft does not write good code, yet we want to support this rule.
    No I DON'T THINK SO.
  • mustafa efkanıl atasever, Turkey, 25 Oct 2011 16:30
    Comments: ISO standards should be open source.
  • Nikola Mojovic, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 23 Oct 2011 22:15
  • feyza unver, Turkey, 23 Oct 2011 08:59
    Comments: you have my support.
  • Surya Handika Putratama, Indonesia, 20 Oct 2011 14:02
  • Tuncay Yenici, Turkey, 20 Oct 2011 07:23
  • Hakan Güven, Turkey, 20 Oct 2011 06:43
  • Yiğit Öztürkçü, Turkey, 19 Oct 2011 15:29
    Comments: Thanks for all ur products Microsoft but we dont want your restricted file formats anymore!
  • Mehmet Kuzu, Turkey, 19 Oct 2011 11:25
    Comments: No way!
  • ergenekon unsal, China, 16 Oct 2011 04:06
    Comments: Bu yüzden ulusal ISO üyelerinden Microsoft Office OpenXML (OOXML) spesifikasyonunun ISO stadartı haline getirilme oylamasında “HAYIR” oyu vermesini istiyorum.
  • Fatih ..., Turkey, 16 Oct 2011 03:18
  • hakan paçal, Turkey, 13 Oct 2011 03:05
    Comments: pc = internet = özgürlük
  • Muhammed AKTOLU, Turkey, 12 Oct 2011 22:03
  • Eric Winters, United States, 12 Oct 2011 14:10
    Comments: I support the vote of NO! ISO is a standard, not a moneymaker for Microsoft.
  • Gürkan Dönmez, Turkey, 11 Oct 2011 13:29
    Comments: support and use open source for human freedom !
  • Bilal KAYA, Turkey, 10 Oct 2011 08:59
  • Metin Gonen, Turkey, 08 Oct 2011 17:08
  • Ilyas Gasanov, Russian Federation, 08 Oct 2011 09:55
    Comments: My own situation is described here:
    http://pastebin.com/XKWhxdQU
  • hüseyin şimşek, Turkey, 07 Oct 2011 15:05
    Comments: yaşasın özgür yazılım!
  • Paul Bakker, Netherlands, 05 Oct 2011 06:30
  • birol şenol, Turkey, 04 Oct 2011 11:46
  • roni33 rinass, Germany, 03 Oct 2011 21:28
  • Selçuk Gökhan Kalkanoğlu, Turkey, 03 Oct 2011 12:04
  • Gürcan Potur, Turkey, 02 Oct 2011 15:14
    Comments: Open Office'in özgür yazılıma olan desteğini takdir ediyor, OOXML'in de uluslar arası standart olmasını kınıyorum
  • Ferruh Koroglu, Turkey, 30 Sep 2011 13:58
    Comments: ISO standards should be open source.

    Regards,
    FK
  • zahmetr gebi, Turkey, 30 Sep 2011 10:50
    Comments: say no to tekelleşme
  • Yunus KOCABAY, Turkey, 30 Sep 2011 06:36
    Comments: Kapitalist MS ürünlerine hayır!
  • umut kaymak, Turkey, 28 Sep 2011 11:06
  • Samet PAYLAN, Turkey, 28 Sep 2011 07:53
    Comments: Microsoft programlarının en büyük sorunu bir sonraki sürüm dosyalarının bir önceki sürüm ile aynı olduğu söylenmesine rağmen aynı dosyanın bir önceki sürüm programda açılmaması. Bunun en saçma örneği Access 2010 ve 2007 arasında görülmektedir. Yaşasın açık kaynak!
  • Hakan Cavit, Turkey, 27 Sep 2011 06:54
  • deniz atasoy, Turkey, 25 Sep 2011 21:15
    Comments: noooooo
  • ender babal, Turkey, 25 Sep 2011 19:23
  • engin hanci, Turkey, 25 Sep 2011 18:23
  • Bugra Abdullahoglu, Turkey, 25 Sep 2011 12:57
    Comments: Don't make your customers hate you. You know, you now have a huge competitor. You don't wanna lose customers to Apple because of doing such stupid things to make just a bit more money.
  • Fabregoul Odile, Belgium, 23 Sep 2011 13:07
  • Cihan YAŞAR, Turkey, 22 Sep 2011 12:16
    Comments: Mikrosoftun tekel olma arzularına hep beraber engel olmalıyız
  • Alper Tecer, Turkey, 22 Sep 2011 10:20
  • Haluk Şahin, Turkey, 22 Sep 2011 08:21
  • Ali cemil kuş, Turkey, 21 Sep 2011 15:26
  • deniz deniz, Turkey, 20 Sep 2011 11:07
  • Doğan GÜNER, Turkey, 20 Sep 2011 07:43
  • Olcay Guzelil, Turkey, 19 Sep 2011 07:48
  • yılmaz içğa, Turkey, 18 Sep 2011 16:01
  • mustafa taşçı, Turkey, 18 Sep 2011 14:14
    Comments: we either suffer from internet explorer (out of) standarts!
  • ALİ TUZKAN, Turkey, 17 Sep 2011 10:07
  • Cem Dursunoglu, Turkey, 14 Sep 2011 10:45
    Comments: Standarts have not to be somecorporate monopoly
  • Stefano Vecellio, Italy, 12 Sep 2011 18:56
  • Ali Ceylan, Turkey, 12 Sep 2011 15:29
    Comments: Her Türlü Yazılımın Parayla
    Satılmasına Karşı Çıkalım.
    Özgür Yazılımlara Destek Verelim.
  • Davide Repossi, Italy, 12 Sep 2011 09:23
  • Can Şahutoğlu, Turkey, 12 Sep 2011 09:16
  • ahmet oğuz, Turkey, 11 Sep 2011 18:56
    Comments: no
  • Enes Kömür, Turkey, 10 Sep 2011 13:45
  • timur sabcı, Turkey, 09 Sep 2011 12:27
  • Murat Can Şarkalkan, Turkey, 08 Sep 2011 20:10
    Comments: Office'e hayır!
  • Mehmet Kaya, Turkey, 08 Sep 2011 16:14
  • Murat Kıvrak, Turkey, 08 Sep 2011 11:20
    Comments: never will be non free software a standart for the world.
  • Görkem Omrak, Turkey, 08 Sep 2011 06:50
    Comments: Net=Freedom and cost-free.we are not free in the world let us free on the internet
  • Cengiz Karahan, Turkey, 07 Sep 2011 10:01
  • Sreenivasreddy Ranabothu, India, 04 Sep 2011 13:03
    Comments: I strongly agree that we don't require dual standards.
  • Mark Waldron, Australia, 04 Sep 2011 01:24
  • osman özsatır, Turkey, 31 Aug 2011 06:19
    Comments: <HAYIR>OOXML
    NO OOXML
  • Metin Altundemir, Turkey, 30 Aug 2011 17:33
    Comments: No OOXML
  • Jose Basto, Mexico, 29 Aug 2011 02:43
    Comments: Estoy en contra de que Microsoft se adueñe de los estandares libres... es el colmo que quiera limitar la libertad de información
  • ramazan akın, Turkey, 28 Aug 2011 18:34
    Comments: no windows, no msoffice
  • Federico Davoine, Uruguay, 28 Aug 2011 17:40
  • murat sertel, Turkey, 28 Aug 2011 03:02

Total number of signatures: 94989

Most recent signatures:

  • James Bowman, United States, 14 May 2022 15:58
    Comments: s

46 languages

اللغة العربية (ar) — Беларуская (be) — Български (bg) — Català (ca) — Deutsch (de) — Dansk (dk) — English (en) — Español (es) — Eesti (et) — Euskara (eu) — فارسی (fa) — Suomi (fi) — Français (fr) — Galego (ga) — Ελληνικά (gr) — 简体中文版 (hans) — 繁體中文版 (hant) — עברית (he) — हिन्दी (hi) — Magyar (hu) — Hrvatski (hr) — Bahasa Indonesia (id) — Italiano (it) — 日本語 (ja) — ქართული (ka) — 한국말 (ko) — Lietuvių (lt) — Latviešu (lv) — Македонски (mk) — Bahasa Malaysia (my) — Norsk Bokmål (nb) — Nederlands (nl) — Norsk Nynorsk (nn) — Polski (pl) — Português (pt) — Română (ro) — Русский (ru) — Svenska (se) — Slovenčina (sk) — Slovenščina (sl) — Shqip (sq) — Srpski (sr) — ภาษาไทย (th) — Türkçe (tr) — Український (uk) Việt (vi)

» Translate here...

Más información en:

esCampaña Iberoamericana contra la estandarización ISO de OpenXML (OOXML)
ptCampanha Ibero-americana contra a padronização na ISO do OpenXML (OOXML)