<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>ODF Alliance: ODF&#039;s Benchmark for Accessibility</title>
		<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-41598/odf-alliance:odf-s-benchmark-for-accessibility</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;ODF Alliance: ODF&#039;s Benchmark for Accessibility&quot; - To meet the needs of persons with disabilities, governments should demand nothing less in OOXML than what the existing ODF standard delivers, says ODF Alliance</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 16:19:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-41598#post-108227</guid>
				<title>ODF Alliance: ODF&#039;s Benchmark for Accessibility</title>
				<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-41598/odf-alliance:odf-s-benchmark-for-accessibility#post-108227</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>podmokle</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3547</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>A new paper of ODF Alliance is available.<br /> <a href="http://www.odfalliance.org/resources/IssueBriefAccessibility.pdf">http://www.odfalliance.org/resources/IssueBriefAccessibility.pdf</a></p> <p>Some concerns of the comparison with the competitor standard:</p> <blockquote> <p>OOXML does not satisfy Web Content Accessibility Guidelines v1.0.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>OOXML's failure to <strong>reuse existing open standards</strong> that impact accessibility increases the burden on assistive technology developers, who must now decipher and support alternative ways of doing similar things. These open standards (e.g., XForms, SVG, Xlinks, MathML),</p> </blockquote> <p>The paper concludes:</p> <blockquote> <p>Governments should demand that digital documents be accessible to all. <strong>A comprehensive accessibility analysis of OOXML by industry</strong> is needed. Until completed and shortcomings addressed, OOXML remains an “inaccessible document format and not suitable for international standardization nor widespread adoption.”</p> </blockquote> <p>What do you think? I suppose it would be a good idea for <a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members.do?language=EN">my MEP</a> to write a parliament question about the existance of accessibility analysis for OOXML. But I should not further overload him with my computer stuff. <a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members.do?language=EN">Do you want to try</a>?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>