<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>OOXML standardisation harms competitors</title>
		<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-38724/ooxml-standardisation-harms-competitors</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;OOXML standardisation harms competitors&quot; - A Microsoft employee admitted that Open XML standardisation harms other market players. OOXML is advancing their business model.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-38724#post-100494</guid>
				<title>Re: OOXML standardisation harms competitors</title>
				<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-38724/ooxml-standardisation-harms-competitors#post-100494</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>podmokle</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3547</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>&quot;Tsilas is admitting, more explicitly than implicitly, that Microsoft's profit depends on it controlling standards and that OOXML is a product designed to do exactly that. The mask has slipped and the nature of this particular war is on display.&quot;</p> <p>Tsilas should know that it would be very simple to resolve problems:<br /> - get a better patent model than the OSP which is clearly applicable on a workdwide scale and get SUN and others on board<br /> - take the lessons from the German converter study and adapt OOXML accordingly<br /> - add ODF import filters to Office09<br /> - provide a real converter, no not-so-clever-age approach.<br /> - permit OOXML implementations under the GPL.<br /> - document the API as as well<br /> - specify VBScript and VBA<br /> - add the full legacy format binary specification as an informative annex.<br /> - follow the French proposal and draft a new format that integrates ODF.<br /> - provide the Office2007 source code under a shared license and port the application to Linux<br /> All of this would not cost too much and satisfy most of us.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-38724#post-100471</guid>
				<title>Re: OOXML standardisation harms competitors</title>
				<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-38724/ooxml-standardisation-harms-competitors#post-100471</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>stegu</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>30391</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The follow-up in today's ZDNet leader gives more insightful comments on these statements from Microsoft:</p> <p><a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/leader/0,1000002982,39292519,00.htm">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/leader/0,1000002982,39292519,00.htm</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-38724#post-100300</guid>
				<title>OOXML standardisation harms competitors</title>
				<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-38724/ooxml-standardisation-harms-competitors#post-100300</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>podmokle</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3547</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>It is just an explanaition why IBM opposes the Open XML standardization:</p> <blockquote> <p>&quot;They are doing this [=opposing OOXML] because it is advancing their business model. Over 50 percent of IBM's revenues come from consulting services.&quot;</p> </blockquote> <p>says Nicos Tsilas, senior director of interoperability and IP policy at Microsoft.</p> <p><a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39292492,00.htm?r=1">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39292492,00.htm?r=1</a></p> <p>Why not &quot;jealousy&quot;?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>