<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Money makes the Wikipedia go round</title>
		<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-261047/money-makes-the-wikipedia-go-round</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Money makes the Wikipedia go round&quot; - Did you notice, the open xml controversy is gone.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-261047#post-858299</guid>
				<title>Money makes the Wikipedia go round</title>
				<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-261047/money-makes-the-wikipedia-go-round#post-858299</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>podmokle</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3547</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The Open XML process is a great case study why Wikipedia is not always reliable, when money comes into play. Even before the heated phases of the Open XML discussions at ISO a scandal rocked the Wikipedia scene. Rick Jelliffe disclosed in his blog that he was offered money by a company to edit the Open XML article. At that is exactly how this article looks until this very day, a honeypot for young wikipedians who want to watch the dirty tricks.</p> <p>Throughout the controversial phases the editing process demonstrated a clear bias of professional editors towards a certain corporate agenda and pushed the Open XML article towards a &quot;shadow article&quot; as a target, close to advertisement. So regardless what was changed by the 'ordinary guys' would be reversed, step by step.</p> <p>Now the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Office_Open_XML&amp;action=historysubmit&amp;diff=379112152&amp;oldid=377207769">Open XML controversy</a> is gone. We have to understand that a lot of money is at stake. Consider that the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/aug/26/local-government-spending-open-standards-saving">Council could save 50 Million Pounds</a> by shifting to ODF and open source. And that is just a tiny example.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>