<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>University of Toronto says OOXML format &quot;fails&quot;</title>
		<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-16021/university-of-toronto-says-ooxml-format-fails</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;University of Toronto says OOXML format &quot;fails&quot;&quot; - Stephen A. Hockema and Jutta Treviranus of the Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto, look at how OOXML works for persons with disabilities.  Their conclusion: the format does not provide sufficient accessibility.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:29:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-16021#post-40798</guid>
				<title>Re: University of Toronto says OOXML format &quot;fails&quot;</title>
				<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-16021/university-of-toronto-says-ooxml-format-fails#post-40798</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Anonymous</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I wonder why the disabled community did not cry wolf now. They did when ODF was proposed as the only alternative to Massachusetts.<br /> When Ecma-376 Office Open XML was accepted by Massachusetts, they were totally silent. Paid shills?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-16021#post-40378</guid>
				<title>University of Toronto says OOXML format &quot;fails&quot;</title>
				<link>http://noooxml.wikidot.com/forum/t-16021/university-of-toronto-says-ooxml-format-fails#post-40378</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>pieterh</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>99</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>From <a href="http://atrc.utoronto.ca/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=371&amp;Itemid=94">the paper</a>:</p> <p><em>If the ISO adopts OOXML as a standard, this will have significant implications, as many national, regional and municipal governments mandate the use of a standard format in public schools and for all official government documents and records. In an increasingly electronic and on-line document world, the accessibility of this format has clear implications for members of disadvantaged or minority communities and persons with disabilities, as access to educational materials, government services, records, opportunities, participation and representation is at stake. Hence, accessibility should be a crucial prerequisite for standardization and adoption. With this in mind, this paper undertakes a preliminary analysis of the OOXML format with respect to its accessibility, with emphasis on accessibility to persons with disabilities. We will demonstrate that <strong>the OOXML format fails to adequately support accessibility of documents.</strong></em></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>