<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>What is the definition of an &quot;existing document&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-148135/what-is-the-definition-of-an-existing-document</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;What is the definition of an &quot;existing document&quot;?&quot; - ISO SC34, now heavily controlled by Microsoft people who go to ISO meeting happening all over the planet, has published a report of defects of the pseudo ISO standard ISO29500. They do not provide a definition of what is an &quot;existing document&quot;.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-148135#post-452120</guid>
				<title>What is the definition of an &quot;existing document&quot;?</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-148135/what-is-the-definition-of-an-existing-document#post-452120</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>ISO SC34, now heavily controlled by Microsoft people who goes to ISO meetings happening all over the planet, has published a <a href="http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/wg4/archive/sc34-wg4-2009-0036.pdf">report of defects</a> of the pseudo ISO standard ISO29500. They do not provide a definition of what is an "existing document":</p> <blockquote> <p>29500 Defects: Explanation of whether to resolve defects by Corrigendum or by Amendment</p> <p>Defects in ISO/IEC 29500:2008<br /> Explanation of whether to resolve defects<br /> by Corrigendum or by Amendment<br /> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG4<br /> 2009-03-26<br /> […]</p> <p>However, ISO/IEC 29500 is a very large and complex multi-part standard, and it is not surprising that the text contains many unintentional technical defects, which nevertheless don't make it impossible to implement the standard.</p> <p>In the course of drafting, some existing office document features were unintentionally overlooked, which result in it being impossible to fully represent some of the <strong>corpus of existing documents</strong> in ISO/IEC 29500.</p> </blockquote> <p>The corpus of existing documents probably means Office 2007 documents, which is an undocumented file format.</p> <p>Here is the email I sent to the SC34 chairman:</p> <blockquote> <p>From Benjamin Henrion &lt;<span class="wiki-email">gro.iiff|noirnehb#gro.iiff|noirnehb</span>&gt;<br /> to <span class="wiki-email">moc.liamg|12homas#moc.liamg|12homas</span><br /> date Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:53 PM<br /> subject Definition of an "existing document"<br /> <br /> Dear Chairman of SC34,</p> <p>I would like to submit a request and a comment by having read the<br /> following text:</p> <p>0036(pdf) 29500 Defects: Explanation of whether to resolve defects by<br /> Corrigendum or by Amendment</p> <p><a href="http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/wg4/archive/sc34-wg4-2009-0036.pdf">http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/wg4/archive/sc34-wg4-2009-0036.pdf</a></p> <p>"In the course of drafting, some existing office document features<br /> were unintentionally overlooked, which result in it<br /> being impossible to fully represent some of the corpus of existing<br /> documents in ISO/IEC 29500."</p> <p>Can you provide a definition of what an "existing documents" means?</p> <p>Best regards,</p> <p>—<br /> Benjamin Henrion &lt;bhenrion at ffii.org&gt;<br /> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403</p> </blockquote> <p>Let's have a look what definition they provide.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>